Legal Links

Don't forget to visit GROKLAW for the latest legal information and analysis. (note: this site has no official affiliation with Groklaw or other sites)

Cases:

SCO v. IBM (PACER updated 2007/09/20)

RedHat v. SCO (PACER updated 2007/10/11)

SCO v. Novell (PACER updated 2008/01/28)

SCO v. AutoZone (PACER updated 2007/09/17)

SCO v. DaimlerChrysler

USL v. BSDi

UC Regents v. USL

Yarro et al v. Kreidel et al, Canopy et al v. Yarro et al

Novell v. Microsoft (PACER updated 2007/11/02)

Wallace v. Free Software Foundation (PACER updated 2006/03/20)

Wallace v. IBM, Red Hat, and Novell (PACER updated 2006/08/31)

Other Documents and Information

SCO Group, Inc., et al. v. Chapter 11 (PACER updated 2008/10/03)

SCO Operations, Inc., et al. v. Chapter 11

Display all

SCO v. AutoZone

Current local time: Wed, February 5, 2025 12:56 am

U.S. District Court, District of Nevada. Case Number CV-S-04-0237 - DWH-LRL, Judge David W. Hagen, Magistrate Lawrence R. Leavitt.

Case number: 2:04-cv-00237-RCJ-GWF - Judge Robert C. Jones, Magistrate George W Foley, Jr..

Exhibits: hide | expand all | normal | (set preference as cookie)

Display: alphabetical | recently updated | motions | calendar

• [info] 1 [PDF] - Amended Calendar Setting - Oral Argument on Defendant AutoZone, Inc.'s Motion to Stay or, in the alternative, For A More Definitive Statement (#10) and Defendant AutoZone, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue (#9)
• [info] 2 [PDF] - Amended Notice of Hearing set for 3:00 5/11/04 for [11] motion to remand, set for 3:00 5/11/04 for [2] motion to dismiss to be held before Judge Kimball [ filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 3 [PDF] - AutoZone's Designation of Resident Counsel on behalf of James Pisanelli, local counsel (Christopher Riley)
• [info] 4 [PDF] - AutoZone's Designation of Resident Counsel on behalf of James Pisanelli, local counsel (David Stewart)
• [info] 5 [PDF] - AutoZone's Designation of Resident Counsel on behalf of James Pisanelli, local counsel (James Allen Harvey)
• [info] 6 [PDF] - AutoZone's Designation of Resident Counsel on behalf of James Pisanelli, local counsel (Michael Kenny)
• [info] 7 [PDF] - AutoZone's Designation of Resident Counsel [SCO v. AZ 18] on behalf of James Pisanelli, local counsel (Douglas Bridges)
• [info] 8 [PDF] - AutoZone's Emergency Motion to Stay (2004-09-01)
• [info] 9 [PDF] - AutoZone's First Interrogatories, AutoZone's First Request for Production of Documents, and AutoZone's Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition [ Groklaw text of interrogatories | Groklaw text of document requests | Groklaw text of deposition notice ]
• [info] 10 [PDF] - AutoZone's Letter of July 15, 2005 to Judge Jones [SCO v. AutoZone 55] (2005-07-15)
• [info] 11 [PDF] - AutoZone's List of Additional SCO Misstatements [ Groklaw text ]
• [info] 12 [PDF] - AutoZone's Motion to Stay or in the Alternative For a More Definite Statement [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 13 [PDF] - AutoZone's Motion to Transfer Venue
• [info] 14 [PDF] - AutoZone's Notice [SCO v. AutoZone 64] of Firm Name Change (2007-01-09)
• [info] 15 [PDF] - AutoZone's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay or, in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement [ Groklaw text ]
• [info] 16 [PDF] - AutoZone's Reply Memorandum In Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue
• [info] 17 [PDF] - AutoZone's Responses to SCO's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for the Production of Documents [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 18 [PDF] - AutoZone's Response [SCO v. AutoZone 53] to SCO's Report [SCO v. AutoZone 52] on Discovery (2005-06-09) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 19 [PDF] - AutoZone's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 51] of May 10, 2005 (2005-05-10) [ Groklaw text ]
• [info] 20 [PDF] - AutoZone's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 60] of January 30, 2006 (2006-01-30)
• [info] 21 [PDF] - AutoZone's Verified Petition of Christopher Riley (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel
• [info] 22 [PDF] - AutoZone's Verified Petition of David Stewart (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel
• [info] 23 [PDF] - AutoZone's Verified Petition of James Allen Harvey (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel
• [info] 24 [PDF] - AutoZone's Verified Petition of Michael Kenny (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel
• [info] 25 [PDF] - AutoZone's Verified Petition [SCO v. AZ 17] of Douglas Bridges (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel
• [info] 26 [PDF] - AutoZone (David J. Stewart) email of January 11, 2005 to SCO (David S. Stone) (2005-01-11) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 27 [PDF] - AutoZone (David J. Stewart) Letter of November 24, 2004 to SCO (David S. Stone) (2004-11-24) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 28 [PDF] - AutoZone (David J. Stewart) Letter of October 27, 2004 to SCO (David S. Stone) (2004-10-27)
• [info] 29 [PDF] - AutoZone (Douglas L. Bridges) Letter of March 4, 2005 to SCO (David S. Stone) (2005-03-04) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 30 [PDF] - Calendar setting re: AutoZone's Emergency Motion to Stay [37] set for September 9, 2004 at 10:00am before Judge Robert C. Jones
• [info] 31 - Deposition of Bob Celmer [Excerpts], May 9, 2005 (2005-05-09) [ Excerpts filed by SCO | Excerpts filed by AutoZone | Combined Excerpts | Groklaw ]
• [info] 32 - Deposition of James Greer [excerpts], September 24, 2004 (2004-09-24) [ Excerpts filed by SCO | Excerpts filed by AutoZone | Combined Excerpts | Groklaw ]
• [info] 33 [PDF] - Designation of Resident Attorney Admitted to the Bar of the Court and Consent Thereto
• [info] 34 [PDF] - Hearing (SCO v. AutoZone) July 12, 2004 [ portion filed with AutoZone's emergency motion to stay | Groklaw | mp3 | ogg | Groklaw transcript | filed with SCO's statement re: SCO's Opposition to AutoZone's Motion to Stay ]
• [info] 35 [PDF] - Hearing (SCO v. AutoZone) September 9, 2004 (2004-09-09) [ Groklaw transcript | mp3 | ogg ]
• [info] 36 [PDF] - Hearing (SCO v. AutoZone) September 9, 2004 Transcript (cover page only filed as [42]) (2004-09-09)
• [info] 37 [PDF] - IBM's Second Amended Counterclaims (2004-03-29) [ Groklaw | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 38 [PDF] - Index of exhibits
• [info] 39 [PDF] - Memorandum Order (RedHat v. SCO) denying [8] motion to Dismiss; case is stayed pending resolution of Utah litigation between SCO and IBM; parties shall each submit a letter every 90 days as to the status of the Utah litigation; if the Utah litigation is not proceeding in an orderly and efficient fashion the court may reconsider the stay (signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson) [Edit date 04/06/04] Per Court's Order, the following motions are moot: mooting [30] motion To Supplement the Record, mooting [17] motion For Enlargment of Time to Respond to Pltf's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents and Things, mooting [15] motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss [ Groklaw | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 40 [PDF] - Minutes of the Court and Order submitting to Chief Judge Philip M. Pro for reassignment
• [info] 41 [PDF] - Minutes of the Court reassigning case to the Honorable Robert C. Jones
• [info] 42 [HTML] - Mirror of Jim Greer letter about AutoZone
• [info] 43 [PDF] - Notice of hearing (SCO v. AutoZone) scheduled for Monday, June 21, 2004 @ 9:00am
• [info] 44 [PDF] - Novell's Memorandum in support of [2] motion to dismiss [ filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 45 [PDF] - Novell's Notice of Removal [ Groklaw 1 | Groklaw 2 | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 46 [PDF] - Oral Argument on AutoZone's Motion to Stay etc (#10) & Motion to Transfer Venue (#9) resked to 7/12/04 @9am bfr RCJ.
• [info] 47 [PDF] - Order (SCO v. AutoZone #46) granting stipulation to extend the time for completing all relevant party & non-party discovery to 60 days from date of this ord. All other discovery deadlines remain the same
• [info] 48 [PDF] - Order (SCO v. AutoZone): Motion for stay (#10) is GRANTED. ptys shal submit a ltr every 90 dys. mtn for transfer (#9) is DENIED w/o prejudice [ Groklaw | filed with AutoZone emergency motion to stay ]
• [info] 49 [PDF] - Order (SCO v. AutoZone) Denying [37] AutoZone's Motion to Stay
• [info] 50 [PDF] - Order (SCO v. AutoZone) granting Stipulation to extend party and non-party discovery by 30 days (2004-11-15)
• [info] 51 [PDF] - Order granting IBM's Motions to Compel Discovery and Requests for Production of Documents [ Groklaw | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 52 [PDF] - Order Regarding SCO's Motion to Compel Discovery and IBM's Motion to Compel Discovery [ Groklaw 1 | Groklaw 2 | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 53 [PDF] - Order to continue hearing to July 12, 2004 at 9am in courtroom 7D
• [info] 54 [PDF] - Order [SCO v. AutoZone 56] Reassigning Judge George W. Foley, Jr. as Magistrate [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 55 [PDF] - RedHat's Complaint against SCO (2004-08-04) [ original | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 56 [PDF] - Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright
• [info] 57 [PDF] - SCO's Amended Complaint against IBM (2003-06-16) [ original | html | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 58 [PDF] - SCO's Complaint against AutoZone
• [info] 59 [HTML] - SCO's Complaint against IBM (2003-03-06) [ copy with exhibits | SCO's copy | Groklaw text | filed with AutoZone motion to stay | filed with Novell's 2nd motion to dismiss ]
• [info] 60 [PDF] - SCO's Complaint against Novell [ Groklaw | SCO's copy | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 61 [PDF] - SCO's Declaration [SCO v. AutoZone 52-1] of David S. Stone, May 27, 2005 (2005-05-27) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 62 [PDF] - SCO's Designation of Resident Counsel obo Glenn M. Machado, local cnsl (Robert A. Magnanini) (SCO v. AutoZone)
• [info] 63 [PDF] - SCO's Designation of Resident Counsel on behalf of Glenn M. Machado, local counsel (David S. Stone) (SCO v. AutoZone)
• [info] 64 [PDF] - SCO's Letter [SCO v. AutoZone 47] of January 18, 2005 to Judge Jones (2005-01-18) [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 65 [PDF] - SCO's Letter [SCO v. AutoZone 48] of March 16, 2005 to Judge Jones (2005-03-16) [ Groklaw text ]
• [info] 66 [PDF] - SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to AutoZone's Motions to Transfer to the Western District of Tennessee, and Stay, or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement [ filed with SCO's statement re: SCO's Opposition to AutoZone's Motion to Stay ]
• [info] 67 [PDF] - SCO's Memorandum in opposition to [2] Novell's motion to dismiss [ SCO's copy | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 68 [PDF] - SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to [37] AutoZone's Motion to Stay
• [info] 69 [PDF] - SCO's Motion to remand (SCO v. Novell) [ filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 70 [PDF] - SCO's Opening Brief re: [8] Motion to Dismiss RedHat case [ Groklaw | filed with AutoZone motion to stay ]
• [info] 71 [PDF] - SCO's Report [SCO v. AutoZone 52] Regarding Discovery Pursuant to the Order of The Court Dated August 6, 2004 (2005-05-27) [ Groklaw | Groklaw text ]
• [info] 72 [PDF] - SCO's Revised Supplemental Response to IBM's First and Second Set of Interrogatories (2004-01-15)
• [info] 73 [PDF] - SCO's Second Amended Complaint against IBM (2004-02-27) [ Groklaw | Groklaw on copyright claim | filed with AutoZone motion to stay | filed as proposed 2nd Amended Complaint ]
• [info] 74 [PDF] - SCO's Statement (SCO v. AutoZone) re: SCO's Opposition to AutoZone's Motion to Stay
• [info] 75 [PDF] - SCO's Statement of Basis for Claim for Preliminary Injunctive Relief and Nature of Relief (SCO v. AutoZone) (2004-08-30) [ Groklaw | Certificate of Service ]
• [info] 76 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 50] of April 18, 2005 (2005-04-18) [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 77 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 57] of October 14, 2005 (2005-10-14)
• [info] 78 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 58] of October 19, 2005 (2005-10-19)
• [info] 79 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 59] of January 17, 2006 (2006-01-17)
• [info] 80 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 61] of April 17, 2006 (2006-04-17)
• [info] 81 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 62] of July 17, 2006 (2006-07-17)
• [info] 82 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 63] of October 26, 2006 (2006-10-26)
• [info] 83 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone 66] for May 23, 2007 (2007-05-23)
• [info] 84 [PDF] - SCO's Status Report [SCO v. AutoZone] of 1/18/2007 (2007-01-18)
• [info] 85 [PDF] - SCO's summons on AutoZone
• [info] 86 [PDF] - SCO's Verified Petition of David S. Stone (Petitioner) as out-of-state counsel (SCO v. AutoZone)
• [info] 87 [PDF] - SCO's Verified Petition of Robert A. Magnanini (Petnr) as out of state counsel (SCO v. AutoZone)
• [info] 88 - SCO (David S. Stone) letter of July 30, 2004 to The Court (in SCO v. AutoZone) (2004-07-30)
• [info] 89 [PDF] - SCO Letter of July 18, 2005 to Judge Jones [SCO v. AutoZone 54] (2005-07-18) [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 90 [PDF] - Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for AutoZone to Answer SCO's Complaint
• [info] 91 [PDF] - Stipulation (SCO v. AutoZone) for Extension of time for SCO to file Statement (2004-08-23)
• [info] 92 [PDF] - Stipulation (SCO v. AutoZone) Regarding Confidentiality [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 93 [PDF] - Stipulation and Order [SCO v. AutoZone 49] for an Additional 45 days of Discovery (2005-03-23) [ Groklaw ]
• [info] 94 [PDF] - Stipulation for Extention of Time to File Motion (SCO v. AutoZone)
• [info] 95 - Transcript of proceedings (SCO v. AutoZone): dtd 7/12/04 Crt recorder Lilia Abarca re: mtns (FLD SEP)
• [info] 96 [PDF] - Verified Petition for Permission to Practice in this Case Only by Attorney Not Admitted to the Bar of this Court